Google+ Followers

Tuesday, 13 January 2015

Medicare changes: Tony Abbott's cruellest cuts

Medicare changes: Tony Abbott's cruellest cuts



831 98





The Abbott Government's changes to Medicare are poised to make life even tougher for struggling Australians, writes Peter Wicks from Wixxyleaks.



THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT that life is becoming tougher under the Abbott Government — and it seems poised to become even tougher.



With the unemployment level reaching
dizzy heights it hasn’t reached since John Howard was in The Lodge and
the cost of living heading in a Northerly direction, I thought I’d offer
some words of comfort my mum used to say for those struggling to make
ends meet:




“At least you have your health, and that’s the most important thing.”




I’m sure many mothers used to say the same thing, however I wonder if
Tony Abbott’s mother ever did. If she did, it doesn’t seem to have sunk
in; or perhaps he just doesn’t care, thinking poor health is other
people’s problems.




In continuing with the Liberal Party ideology that says certain
things should only be for the rich – you know, little things like a fair
trial or high quality education – Tony Abbott seems determined to add
good healthcare to the list of things only the rich should enjoy.




It was something that actually made us glad to have Jacqui Lambie in the Senate — after all, the Coalition's plans for a $7 charge to see a doctor was
only abandoned once it became apparent the plan would not pass through
the Upper House. The Coalition referred to it as a GP co-payment at the
time, the country however thought of it as a kick in the guts.




Not only that, there was some creative accounting being done behind
the scenes with Joe Hockey’s calculator — the one that seemingly goes to
11. The money raised by the tax was supposed to make the Medicare
system more sustainable, despite all of it going into a Medical Research Fund.
The savings to the Government were based on the notion that the GP
co-payment would make Australians go to the doctor less and hence save
the Government money. A forward thinking person may think that a lower
standard of health through less doctor visits may have an impact later
on hospital admissions but, alas, there was not a forward thinker to be
found in the Coalition caucus.




Luckily, the Senate did.





However, we were not saved for long.



Tony Abbott has claimed to have heard Australians voices on a number
of the unfair elements of his Budget and wants us to think he is making
changes accordingly.




If health is supposed to be one of the things Abbott is sending a new
message to the nation on, then that message translated would appear to
be: “Screw You”.




As a means of going around the Senate to have his great big new Sick
Tax implemented, Abbott and his former henchman come Health Minister Peter Dutton
concocted a scheme to cut the rebate paid to doctors, thus forcing
doctors to have two options — charge patients or effectively halve their
income.




However, given it is a Coalition Government we are talking about, even something this simple could not be done without a major screw up.



The changes were announced by Dumb and Dumber, Dutton and Abbott, on
December 9 came with a “fact-sheet” to the industry that was anything
but. According to the fact sheet, doctors that have not completed GP specialisation would receive a higher rebate than those that have.








Excerpt from the Medicare changes fact-sheet (Image pm.gov.au)



You could be forgiven for thinking that Abbott and co were preferring
us to see witch doctors, medicine men, or gypsies with crystals rather
than specialist GPs.




Twelve days later, crisis was averted when changes were made to the definitions of Medicare items for non-specialised GP’s.



So what are the changes and how will they affect us?



The changes to the rebate for doctors cut the rebate for a visit by a
non-concessional patient of between five and 10 minutes from $37.05 to
$16.95 for a specialist GP, and from $21 to $11 for a non-specialist GP.
That’s around a 50% cut, more for a specialist.




For most, that will mean that the sick tax has gone from $7 to $20. What it also means is that if you go to a GP that bulk bills, after the 19th January when the sick tax kicks in there is a very good chance they won’t be bulk billing anymore.







Another issue will be that the doctors’ visits will be longer, as the
rebate is less affected by longer visits, thus drastically increasing
waiting times for patients.




Don’t be surprised if some members of the Coalition try to blame this
on the Senate for refusing to allow the original $7 sick tax pass
Senate. We can expect the Coalition spin doctors and MPs to tell us all
how the Medicare system must be sustainable and how the Government had
to stem the bleeding of funds from the budget due to those who rort the
system by seeing a doctor too often.




However, there are other ways to make Medicare more sustainable than
by implementing a sick tax. Not wanting to be one of those who
criticises without offering a solution, here’s one from me.




We should look at scrapping the discount on the Medicare Levy for
those with private health insurance. After all, tthose with private
health insurance very often still end up in a public hospital using a
public hospital bed and the same staff as the rest of us.




People don’t choose where they have a heart attack, or plan where
they are involved in a car accident, so in emergency situations many of
the benefits private health insurance cover are about as useful as a
unicycle to your pet goldfish.




Nevertheless, despite using the public health system, the government
still offers them a discount for having insurance while those that don’t
have insurance subsidise their stay in hospital.




The rich are being subsidised by the poor. For those of you thinking
this must have been a John Howard initiative, you would be right. And
let’s not forget Tony Abbott was health minister under Howard.






While the Coalition's insurance company lobbyist mates rub their
hands together, the middle class welfare continues as we all are forced
to pay a sick tax.




Welfare is designed to help those that need it most, however we currently have a government that seems to think differently.



As we have already seen, the Abbott Government's sights are firmly
set on the unemployed, the pensioners and the disabled — or "the
leaners", as they are often referred to. That trend seems set to
continue, as the Coalition's middle-class welfare gravy train continues
rumbling on.




In another twist to this debate, the sick tax coming into force on 19 January will push a hospital system already struggling under
Coalition state and Federal cuts even closer towards breaking point.
This, in turn, will add to the pressure on the state governments to call
for changes to the GST.




How convenient.



Peter Wicks is a Labor Party member and a former NSW ALP state candidate. You can follow Peter Wicks on Twitter @madwixxy.

No comments:

Post a Comment